High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 CrPC challenging trial court proceedings. The Court refused jurisdiction as the petitioner withdrew a prior petition and did not appear to argue, rendering the exercise of power unnecessary.
Petition dismissed; stay petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2702/2022
Vinita Dave W/o Amit Kumar Dave, Aged About 34 Years, B/c Brahmin, R/o Kethnodh, Teh. Pachpadra, Dist. Barmer (Raj.).
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Nonepresent |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. S.K. Bhati, Public Prosecutor |
| Mr. Piyush Chouhan for complainant |
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
01/11/2022
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-2702/2022]
only dismissed the aforesaid petition filed by the petitioner, but had also issued direction to the trial Court to expedite the proceedings and conclude the same within a period of three months thereafter.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
152-Ramesh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC in a petition filed by a petitioner who withdrew a prior petition and failed to appear in the present hearing.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vinita Dave W/o Amit Kumar Dave
State Of Rajasthan
Babulal S/o Kapuraram
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
