Petitions were dismissed for want of prosecution as counsel for the petitioners did not appear physically or via video conference after pending since
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2607/2016
(All are R/o House No.4-Jha-14, Vigyan Nagar, Kota, Rajasthan).
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2060/2016
(All are R/o House No.4-Jha-14, Vigyan Nagar, Kota, Rajasthan).
----Petitioners
Versus
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-2607/2016]
State Of Rajasthan Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahendra Meena, Public Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
Order
11/07/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioners neither appeared physically nor connected through video conferencing and the petitions have been pending since 2016.
Hence, the both the petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution.
Misc. applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J
Ashish Kumar/59-60
Junun Ali S/o Akhatar Ali and Others
State Of Rajasthan Through PP
Chandra Kumar Songara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
