An S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous petition was held infructuous because an Affidavit in Support of a Financial Request (Adam-Vaku) was filed in the civil court, making the criminal petition unnecessary.
The criminal miscellaneous petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2395/2021
Vinod Kumar S/o Shri Bhagwat Prasad, R/o Village And Post Piprau Tehsil Nadbai Bharatpur Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Nonepresent |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Atul Sharma,PP. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
11/10/2022
None present on behalf of the petitioner.
Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the factual report in which Investigating Officer stated that FR has been submitted before the court concerned as Adam-Vaku and case pertains to civil nature. So, this criminal miscellaneous petition has become infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Seema/12
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vinod Kumar
State Of Rajasthan
The State Bank Of India
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
