Allowed miscellaneous petition quashing FIR No.161/2013 under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120B based on settlement and precedent, invoking inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
FIR No.161/2013 and entire subsequent proceedings were quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 2)
[CRLMP-2262/2016]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2262/2016
Uma Shankar And Anr
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Anr.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Menaria For Respondent(s) : Mr. Karan Singh Rajpurohit, AAG. Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP Mr. Pradeep Shah
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
15/09/2022
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-2262/2016]
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
26-Jitender/nirmala
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR and subsequent proceedings can be quashed due to compromise between parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh V/s. State of Punjab & Anr.Applied¶16
Gian Singh V/s. State of Punjab & Anr. [(2012) 10 SCC 303] · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Uma Shankar
State
Pusprendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
