Sandhya Mukherjee v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that the criminal miscellaneous petition became infructuous, resulting in the dismissal of the petition without further adjudication on the merits.
The High Court held that the criminal miscellaneous petition became infructuous, resulting in the dismissal of the petition without further adjudication on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1931/2019
Sandhya Mukherjee W/o Swapan Kumar Mukherjee, Aged About 50 Years, A-45, Ug-2, Block A Extention, Mohan Garden, Uttam Nagar, West Delhi.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Rakesh Gupta |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi,PP |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
01/12/2022
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has been rendered infructous.
The misc. petition, thus, is dismissed as having become infructous.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
175-Sanjay/-
Sandhya Mukherjee
State
Satyaprakash Soni
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court