A criminal miscellaneous petition was dismissed as infructuous because the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the final report had been filed before the competent court.
All pending applications stand disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1564/2014
Lalit And Anr.
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Anr.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Saruparia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
18/08/2022
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the final report has been filed before the competent court.
On such submission, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. All pending applications stand disposed of.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
128-Zeeshan
Lalit And Anr.
State And Anr.
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
