The petitioner appeared unrepresented in the second round of arguments. The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition for want of prosecution and disposed of the miscellaneous application.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; miscellaneous application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1487/2020
Bihari Lal S/o Shri Rameshwar Lal, R/o 191, Room No. 5310, Geetanjali Housing Society, Panth Nagar, Ghatkopar, East Mumbai, Ghatkopar, Barihan Mumbai City, Maharashtra
----Complainant/Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahendra Meena, Public Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
Order
15/07/2022
Even in second round also, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Consequently, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of.
(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J
Satyendra/6
Bihari Lal
State Of Rajasthan
CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
