Bheemsen v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition as infructuous after a chargesheet was filed in the matter, allowing the petitioners to raise issues in the trial court.
What did the court decide?
The instant misc. petition and all pending applications were dismissed as having become infructuous.
What the court decided
(1 of 1)
[CRLMP-1462/2020]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1462/2020
- Bheemsen S/o Jaymal Ram, Aged About 55 Years, By Caste Suthar, R/o Ward No. 23, Behind Bsnl Tower, Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar.
- Rani Devi W/o Bheemsen, Aged About 50 Years, By Caste Suthar, R/o Ward No. 23, Behind Bsnl Tower, Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar.
----Petitioners
Versus
- State, Through P.p.
- Executive Engineer, Municipal Board, Suratgarh, Sadar, District Sri Ganganagar.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : -- For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bheemsen S/o Jaymal Ram
- petitioner
Rani Devi W/o Bheemsen
- respondent
State
- respondent
Executive Engineer, Municipal Board, Suratgarh
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMP/1462/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court