Partly allowed

Anjali Pareek v. State

Rajasthan HC2 Dec 2022CRLMP/1414/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge order in two connected criminal miscellaneous petitions (No. 1414/2022 and 1692/2022) dismissed the first petition since the petitioner accepted security. In the second, the court directed legal aid, expeditious closure of investigation, and listed the case on 10.01.2023.

What did the court decide?

Direction to provide legal aid; investigation to be completed expeditiously; case to be called on 10.01.2023.

Anjali Pareek Vs State — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

¶2

JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1414/2022

¶4

Anjali Pareek D/o Bhanwar Lal Vyas, Aged About 37 Years, B/c Brahmin, R/o 25 Ratan Sarkar Garden Street, Thana Posta, Kolkata.

¶5

Amreeta Pareek D/o Bhanwar Lal Vyas, Aged About 38 Years, B/c Brahmin, R/o 25 Ratan Sarkar Garden Street, Thana Posta, Kolkata.

¶6

Vimla Devi Vyas W/o Bhanwar Lal Vyas, Aged About 60 Years, B/c Brahmin, R/o 25 Ratan Sarkar Garden Street, Thana Posta, Kolkata.

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State, Through Pp

¶10

The Commissioner Of Police, Jodhpur.

¶11

The Station House Officer, P.s. Sardarpura, Dist. Jodhpur.

¶12

Sh. Gopal Rathi S/o Hari Gopal Rathi, B/c Rathi, R/o Rathi Pol, Bhajan Chowki, Kabotaron Ka Chowk, Khanda Falsa, Jodhpur.

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

Connected With

¶15

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1692/2022

¶16

Shree Gopal Rathi S/o Sh. Hari Gopal Rathi, Aged About 54 Years, Near Bhajan Chowki, Kabutaro Ka Chowk, Jodhpur.

¶17

----Petitioner

¶18

Versus

¶19

1. 2.	State Of Raj Smt. Anjali Sarkar Gard Bengal).	asthan,Through Pp Pareek D/o Sh. Bhanwar Lal Vyas, Ratan en Street, P.s. Posta, Dist. Kolkata (West ----Respondents
For P	etitioner(s)	: Mr. Deepak Menaria (CRLMP No.1692/2022) Ms. Anjali Pareek, Present in Person (CRLMP No.1414/2022)
For R	espondent(s)	: Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, PP Ms. Anjali Pareek, (CRLMP No.1692/2022)

¶20

----Respondents

¶21

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI Order

02/12/2022

(2 of 2)

[CRLMP-1414/2022]

In S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1414/2022:-

¶26

The petitioner No.1 (present in person) submits that she has been provided some security and therefore, she does not want to pursue the present petition.

¶27

Consequently, the present misc. petition is dismissed.

¶28

The application No.01/22 for preponement of date is disposed of.

¶29

In S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1692/2022:-

¶30

The Office is directed to provide lawyer to the respondent No.2/complainant through legal aid.

¶31

Learned Public Prosecutor is directed to get the investigation completed expeditiously.

¶32

Learned Public Prosecutor shall also be required to call for the case diary on the next date.

¶33

List on 10.01.2023.

¶34

Interim order shall remain in currency till then.

¶35

The applications No.01/22 & 02/22 are disposed of.

¶36

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

¶37

107-108-nirmala/-

Anjali Pareek v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anjali Pareek v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Damaram Vs State

Nitin Arora Vs State

Axis Bank Ltd. Vs State

Dinesh Parihar Vs State of Rajasthan

Subhash Vishnoi Vs State of Rajasthan

Saddique Khan and Ors. Vs State and Ors.