Allowed

Kuldeep @ Nikku Son of Dharampal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC24 Jun 2022CRLMB/9534/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for two accused persons involved in a cheating offence. The court granted bail on a bond with sureties without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted with furnishing of a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Kuldeep @ Nikku Son of Dharampal Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9534/2022

¶3

Kuldeep @ Nikku Son Of Dharampal, R/o Karota Police Station Nangal Choudhary, District Mahendragarh Presently Bhirr, Police Station Buhana, District Jhunjhunu ( At Present Accused Confined In Jail Jhunjhunu)

¶4

Amit Son Of Nand Lal @ Nand Ram, R/o Dewlawas, Police Station Pacheri Kalan, District Jhunjhunu ( At Present Accused Confined In Jail Jhunjhunu)

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI (V.J.)

¶11

Order

¶12

24/06/2022

¶13

The present bail applications have been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the accused-petitioners Kuldeep @ Nikku Son Of Dharampal & Amit Son Of Nand Lal @ Nand Ram. The accused-petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 338/2021 registered at Police Station Ketri District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Section 136 of IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that false case has been foisted against the petitioners. He further submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents, they are behind the bars since long and conclusion of trial may take long time.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-9534/2022]

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶18

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioners and taking into account the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners named above shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

(FARJAND ALI (V.J.)),J

¶21

ARTI SHARMA /141

Kuldeep @ Nikku Son of Dharampal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kuldeep @ Nikku Son of Dharampal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dheeraj Khandelwal Son of Devendra Kumar Khandelwal Vs the Central Bureau of Narcotics

Ajad Tilor S/O Bhajan Tilor Vs State of Rajasthan

Arun Agrawal S/O Vaijnath Agrawal Vs State of Rajasthan

Dheemaram Bishnoi Son of Hanumanaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Salman S/O Shahjad Ali @ Faiyad Ali Vs State of Rajasthan

Satya Shri Siddharth @ Somu S/O Premchand Vs State of Rajasthan