In this order, the High Court of Rajasthan dismissed two bail applications submitted by accused persons who never pressed them. No intervention was possible.
Bail applications dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 89/2022
Imanudeen @ Manraj S/o Noormohammad, R/o Near Jumma Mosque Bandipura Ps Malakheda Distt. Alwar Raj. (Presently Accused In Central Jail Alwar)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1437/2022
Rauf Ahmed @ Rocky S/o Tahir Khan, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Near Old Masjid Ubhanka, Police Station Pahari, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) (At Present The Accused In Judicial Custody At Sub Jail Kishangarhbas, District Alwar)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Gupta. Mr. Azad Ahmed. For Respondent(s) : Mr. F.R. Meena, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
22/03/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the bail applications.
Accordingly, the bail applications are dismissed as not pressed. The petitioners are at liberty to file fresh bail applications after filing of challan.
[CRLMB-89/2022]
(2 of 2)
Learned Public Prosecutor is directed to instruct the IO to submit the result of the investigation at the earliest.
(FARJAND ALI),J
PREETI VALECHA /57-58
Imanudeen @ Manraj S/o Noormohammad
Rauf Ahmed @ Rocky S/o Tahir Khan
State Of Rajasthan
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
