Allowed

Manoj Kumar Verma Son of Shri Banshidhar Verma v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Aug 2022CRLMB/8660/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Singh Dhaddha allowed the bail application made by Manoj Kumar Verma. The court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail subject to furnishing personal bond and sureties without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to furnish personal bond in sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each for appearance before court.

Manoj Kumar Verma Son of Shri Banshidhar Verma Vs… — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8660/2022 Manoj Kumar Verma Son Of Shri Banshidhar Verma, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Village Rundal Manpura, Police Station Chandwaji Jaipur Rural At Present R/o Plot Nol. 269, Pratap Nagar Chauraha, Murlipura, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶3

----Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶6

----Respondent

¶7

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devendra Kumar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ghan Shyam Singh Rathore, GAcum-AAG with Mr. Santosh Shekhawat, AAG Mr. Nawab Khan, (SOG), Addl. S. P. (I.O.)

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶9

Order

¶10

01/08/2022

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 13/2022 Registered at Police Station S. O. G., Jaipur for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 120-B IPC and Sections 3/10 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention Of Use Of Unfair Means) Act.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been wrongly implicated in this case. He is behind the bars since long. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there is no specific allegation regarding leakage of paper against the petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused Pooja was enlarged on

¶13

(2 of 2)

¶14

[CRLMB-8660/2022]

¶15

bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and conclusion of trial may take long time.

¶16

Learned GA-cum-AAG has opposed the bail application. 4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the

¶17

petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶18

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Manoj Kumar Verma Son Of Shri Banshidhar Verma shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶19

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶20

Gourav/08

Manoj Kumar Verma Son of Shri Banshidhar Verma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Kumar Verma Son of Shri Banshidhar Verma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bheru Lal Vs State

Praveen Giri Son of Shri Arjun Giri Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Lalita W/O Sh. Rajendra Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Neha Jain D/O Late Ashok Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Gaurav S/O Suresh Vs State of Rajasthan

Sonu S/O Bhurji Vs State of Rajasthan