Allowed

Mukesh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC24 Aug 2022CRLMB/8546/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan granted bail to Mukesh S/o Indraj under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in an NDPS Act case. The court ordered release on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties, deeming it just and proper despite not expressing an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Mukesh Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8546/2022

¶3

Mukesh S/o Indraj, Aged About 32 Years, Charno Ki Dhani, Jalimpura, P.s. Sadar, Jhunjhunun. (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail, Nohar).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. J.K. Suthar
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan,P.P.

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS

¶10

Order

¶11

24/08/2022

¶12

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by the applicant for grant of bail in connection with FIR No.532/2020, registered at Police Station Nohar, District Hanumangarh, for offences punishable under Sections 8/18 & 29 of the NDPS Act.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

¶14

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that co-accused Shayar Singh, from whose possession opium in below commercial quantity was alleged to be recovered, has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 20.01.2021 by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.576/2021. No recovery has been made from the possession of applicant. After completion of the investigation, charge-sheet has already been

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-8546/2022]

¶17

filed under Section 29 of the NDPS Act; he is under custody since 13.06.2022. In view of the above circumstances, learned counsel for the applicant prays to allow the bail application.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the grant of bail application.

¶19

Having regard to the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and material available on record, in the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶20

Accordingly, this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the applicant Mukesh S/o Indraj, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.532/2020, registered at Police Station Nohar, District Hanumangarh, shall be released on bail provided he shall execute personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with two sound & solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so.

¶21

(RAMESHWAR VYAS),J

¶22

35-Samvedana/-

Mukesh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Ajay Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Babulal @ Babliya Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Kumar Vs State

Govind Vs State

Arbaaz Hussain Vs State of Rajasthan