Huka v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the non-pressed bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., granting the petitioner liberty to file a fresh bail application after recording specific statements.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to file a fresh bail application after recording statements of Jaguda and Smt. Nagari.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 829/2022
Huka S/o Harish Ninama, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Chhliya Badi Choti Sarvan, Police Thana Danpur, District Banswara (Raj.) (Presently Lodged In District Jail, Banswara)
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through PP
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Order
18/02/2022
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner does not want to press the bail application, however, seeks liberty to file fresh bail application after recording of statements of Jaguda and Smt. Nagari.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application should be dismissed as not pressed in the absence of immediate representation from the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Huka S/o Harish Ninama
- respondent
State, Through PP
Coram
DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/829/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court