Allowed

Ajay v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Jul 2022CRLMB/8108/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur granted bail to the petitioner accused of an offence under Section 379 IPC, held triable by Magistrate, deeming it just to release him pending trial on furnishing a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted in FIR No. 67/2022, PS Nohar, District Hanumangarh on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Ajay Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR.

¶2

….

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 8108/2022

¶4

Ajay S/o Subhash, aged about 30 years, R/o Jodhka, Tehsil Nadhusari, Chopta, District Sirsa (Haryana). (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail, Nohar).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajender Kumar Soni. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi, PP.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶11

Order

¶12

06/07/2022

¶13

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 67/2022, Police Station Nohar, District Hanumangarh, for the offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the offence alleged to have been committed by the petitioner is triable by Magistrate. He further submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accusedpetitioner.

¶15

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶16

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-8108/2022]

¶17

I have considered the arguments advanced before me and

¶18

gone through the material available on record.

¶19

Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner, Ajay S/o Subhash , shall be enlarged on bail in F.I.R. No. 67/2022, Police Station Nohar, District Hanumangarh, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/ - with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/ - each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶22

78-Mohan/-

Ajay v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jawed @ Dabbu Vs State

Megla @ Meglaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Magan Vs State

Vikas Kumar Vs State

Kalu Ram Dakot @ Kalu Dakot @ Raja Dakot Vs State

Poonam Singhal Vs State of Rajasthan