Krishan Kumar Verma v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur rejected an anticipatory bail application. The petitioner was directed to surrender by 11.05.2022 to file for bail which the trial court must decide immediately, with no arrest permitted until then.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner permitted to surrender on or before 11.05.2022 to file a bail application; no arrest allowed until then.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 789/2022
Krishan Kumar Verma S/o Sultan Ram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Bhoda Hoshnak, Tehsil And District Fatehbad (Haryana)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Moti Singh |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. S.K. Bhati,PP. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
04/05/2022
After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, hence this bail application is rejected.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in case of enforcing FIR No. 03/2021.
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to surrender for filing a regular bail application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Krishan Kumar Verma
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
Coram
Manoj Kumar Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/789/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court