Allowed

Lala Ram S/O Chhitar Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC25 May 2022CRLMB/7845/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed the second bail application under Section 439 CrPC. The petitioner, with 12 criminal antecedents and on bail in all, was ordered to furnish a bond with sureties. The court decided without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.

Lala Ram S/O Chhitar Lal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail 2^nd Application No. 7845/2022

¶3

Lala Ram S/o Chhitar Lal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Baheda, Police Station Diggi District Tonk (Raj.) ( At Present Confined At Central Jail Jaipur)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through The P.p. Rajasthan High Court Jaipur Bench Jaipur.

¶7

	----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Ankit Khandelwal for Mr. D.D. Khandelwal
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA

¶9

Order

¶10

25/05/2022

¶11

This 2^nd bail application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No. 134/2021 registered at Police Station Malpura Gate, District Jaipur for the offence under Section 379 of IPC.

¶12

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the first bail application was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 29.04.2022 as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh after filing of charge-sheet. Now, the charge-sheet has been filed. The petitioner has criminal antecedents of 12 cases and he is on bail in all the cases. Hence, the accused-petitioner may be released on bail.

¶13

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶14

Heard and perused the material available on record.

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-7845/2022]

¶16

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶17

Accordingly, the 2^nd bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Lala Ram S/o Chhitar Lal shall be enlarged on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each (out of which one surety shall be resident of Jaipur Metro or District) to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶18

(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J

¶19

PAYAL/4

Lala Ram S/O Chhitar Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lala Ram S/O Chhitar Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ronak Sharma S/O Rambabu Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Dr Vijay Agrawal Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Om Prakash Yadav S/O Nanakram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh @ Pakodiya Son of Shri Kalyan Vs State of Rajasthan

Deva @ Dayal @ Dayaram Son of Badir Lal Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Walmiki S/O Rajdev Vs State of Rajasthan