Allowed

Arun Agrawal S/O Vaijnath Agrawal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Jun 2022CRLMB/7654/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge Bail Application allowed. The petitioner was arrested for offences under Sections 420, 406, and 120-B IPC. Considering the length of trial and lack of evidence of dishonest inducement, the court granted bail subject to a bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the trial Judge.

Arun Agrawal S/O Vaijnath Agrawal Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7654/2022

¶3

Arun Agrawal S/o Vaijnath Agrawal, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Sector No. 2 Shastri Nagar, Near Agra Bus Stand Ps Nihalganj, Dholpur Rajasthan ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Bishnoi, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI ( V.J.)

¶10

Order

¶11

23/06/2022

¶12

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-petitioner Arun Agrawal S/o Vaijnath Agrawal. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.4/2020 registered at Police Station Chitrakoot, District Jaipur for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406 & 120-B of IPC.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has falsely implicated in this case. There is no element showing the dishonest inducement. The offences are triable by the Court of Magistrate. He has nothing to do with the alleged offence(s) and no useful purpose would be served by keeping him behind the bars. Therefore, his further incarceration would not be justifiable.

¶14

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-7654/2022]

¶17

Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and looking to the possibility that the trial may take long time to conclude, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶18

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner, named above, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶19

(FARJAND ALI ( V.J.)

¶20

ANIL SHARMA /3

Arun Agrawal S/O Vaijnath Agrawal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arun Agrawal S/O Vaijnath Agrawal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhim Saini @ Bhimraj Saini S/O Trilok Chand Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Shubham @ Golu Son of Late Shri Pratap Singh Bhadana Vs State of Rajasthan

Madan Lal Chandiwal S/O Shri Moolchandra @ Murlidhar Vs State of Rajasthan

Dheeraj Khandelwal Son of Devendra Kumar Khandelwal Vs the Central Bureau of Narcotics

Ajad Tilor S/O Bhajan Tilor Vs State of Rajasthan

Arun Agrawal S/O Vaijnath Agrawal Vs State of Rajasthan