Dismissed

Mohammad Salim Ansari S/O Shri Mohammad Hanif Ansari v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Sept 2022CRLMB/6094/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan, in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 6094/2022, dismissed a petition seeking anticipatory bail. The petitioner failed to establish prospect of acquittal, there was significant delay, and injuries occurred post-incident. The court declined to grant bail, noting the potential for judicial inquiry.

What did the court decide?

Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC dismissed.

Mohammad Salim Ansari S/O Shri Mohammad Hanif Ansari Vs… — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 6094/2022

¶3

Mohammad Salim Ansari S/o Shri Mohammad Hanif Ansari, Aged About 35 Years, R/o House No. 2A 18 Chatrapura Talab, Vigyan Nagar, Kota At Present Junior Assistant Office Of Panchayat Samitee Bundi Distt. Bundi Rajasthan

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R B Sharma Ganthola For Respondent(s) : Mr. C G Chopra, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order

¶10

23/09/2022

¶11

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk izkFkhZ dks iqfyl Fkkuk Hkz"Vkpkj fujks/kd C;wjks] eq0 t;iqj ij iathc) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 469@21 varxZr /kkjk 7 Hkz"Vkpkj fuokj.k ¼la'kks/ku½ vf/kfu;e esa vfxze tekur fn;s tkus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶12

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ jgk fd izkFkhZ funksZ"k gS] ifjoknh dks Hkqxrku Lohd`fr dk vkns'k igys gh tkjh gks pqdk Fkk] Hkqxrku gsrq og l{ke vf/kdkjh ugha gS] dksbZ Vªsi dk;Zokgh ugha gqbZ gS] okrkZ lR;kiu dh dk;Zokgh esa vfHk;qDr dh vkokt gks] ;g rF; vHkh lR;kfir ugha gqvk gS] vfHk;qDr vYi osru Hkksxh deZpkjh gS] vdkj.k fxjQ~rkj fd;k x;k rks mlds fof/kd vf/kdkjksa dk guu gksxk] vr% vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA

¶13

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-6094/2022]

¶14

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vfxze tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk tkfgj fd;k fd vfHk;qDr ds }kjk ifjoknh ls mlds Hkqxrku ds cnys igys 5]000@&:i;s rFkk ckn esa 2]000@&:i;s dh ekax dh x;h Fkh ftldk rF; okrkZ lR;kiu vfHkys[k esa miyC/k gSA vfHk;qDr us uewuk vkokt nsus ls badkj dj fn;k gS] izdj.k esa vHkh vuqla/kku gksuk 'ks"k gS] iqfyl us ekeyk izekf.kr ekuk gS] vr% vfxze tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;k tkosA

¶15

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶16

ifjoknh rRdkyhu MkVk ,aVªh vkWijsVj ds in ij dk;Zjr Fkk mldh cdk;k jkf'k ds laca/k esa fj'or jkf'k dh ekax vfHk;qDr }kjk fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa Hkz"Vkpkj fujks/kd C;wjks }kjk okrkZ lR;kiu fd;k x;k gS ftlesa vfHk;qDr }kjk varr% 2]000@&:i;s dh jkf'k ekaxus ds rF; izdV gq, gS] lansg gksus ls Vªsi dk;Zokgh ugha gks ik;h gSA

¶17

izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr] vijk/k dh izd`fr ,oa xaHkhjrk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] izdj.k ds bl izdze ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA

¶18

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ eksgEen lyhe valkjh dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 naM izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA

¶19

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶20

Murari Lal Sharma /74

Mohammad Salim Ansari S/O Shri Mohammad Hanif Ansari v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Salim Ansari S/O Shri Mohammad Hanif Ansari v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Ram Singh Vs State

Mahaveer S/O Ram Chandra Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamal Rathore Son of Shri Dhannalal Vs State of Rajasthan

Raghuraj S/O Shri Bharat Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Hariram Meena S/O Rajaram Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Raghu Alias Raghurajsingh S/O Shri Prathvilal Vs State of Rajasthan