In this anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioner sought protection against arrest for offences under Sections 8/20 NDPS Act. The Court dismissed the application holding that, considering the gravity of the offence and a pending NDPS case, it was not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6069/2022
Rajuddin Son Of Ismail, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Out Side Of Holi Khidkiya, Karauli, P.s. Kotwali, Dist Karauli At Present House No. 23 Gandhi Vihar Vistar, Khonagoriya, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
-- Sanjeev Sharma |
--Respondent |
|---|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Suresh Kumar,PP. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
02/08/2022
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-6069/2022]
petitioner. Learned Public Prosecutor also submitted that one more case of NDPS is pending against the petitioner. So, looking to the gravity of the offence, anticipatory bail be dismissed.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Seema/104
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a fit case to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail given the gravity of the offence and pending case.
Whether grace of anticipatory bail can be extended to petitioner in NDPS case which is not his first such case.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajuddin Son Of Ismail
State Of Rajasthan
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
