Rani v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Jodhpur dismissed two bail applications as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. However, it granted bail to remaining petitioners Tulcha and Ravi accused under IPC and POCSO sections, directing release on personal bond with sureties.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted to petitioners No.2 Tamcha and No.3 Ravi @ Roop Singh on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- each with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each. Applications by others dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7178/2022
Jagdish S/o Lichu Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vill. Chandasar Ps Gajner Dist. Bikaner Raj. (Presently Lodged In Central Jail Bikaner)
----Petitioner
Versus
- State, Through Pp
- K D/o Balram Raikwal, R/o Chaneli Chowk Ravishankar Ward Ps Motinagar Dist. Sagar M.p. At Present Balika Grah Nari Niketan Bikaner
----Respondents
Connected With
- S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6050/2022
- Rani W/o Shri Ravi @ Roopsingh, Aged About 24 Years, R/ o Bachlo Bararu Ps Baheriya Dist. Sagar M.p. (Presently Lodged At Jail Bikaner)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the accused petitioners in connection with the offences under Sections 370, 366A of IPC, POCSO Act, and Child Marriage Protection Act.
Whether bail should be allowed to petitioners No. 2 and No. 3 who had not pressed the application in connection with the others.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jagdish S/o Lichu Ram
- petitioner
Rani W/o Shri Ravi @ Roopsingh
- petitioner
Tulcha W/o Shri Golu @ Kanejalal
- petitioner
Ravi @ Roop Singh S/o Motilal
- respondent
State
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/6050/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court