In a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., this court considered submissions regarding alibi and lack of eye-witnesses versus the recovery of incriminating items and the applicant's antecedents. The court dismissed the application without commenting on merits.
Bail application is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5991/2022
Deepak Sahu Son Of Madanlal Sahu, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Ganehara, Police Station Pushkar, District Ajmer At Present 13 Mod Sunder Nagar Gandhinagar, Police Station Gandhinagar, District Ajmer (At Present In Central Jail Ajmer)
----Applicant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Rajat Ranjan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Babulal Nasuna, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
13/10/2022
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-5991/2022]
contentions. It is submitted that if released on bail, the accusedapplicant shall fully cooperate with the investigation.
5. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
Arun/6
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application challenging the arrest in a case involving murder and robbery should be allowed considering the recovery of evidence and criminal antecedents.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Deepak Sahu
State Of Rajasthan
SAMEER JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
