Petitioner sought a liberty to file fresh bail application after recording witness statements. Bail application was dismissed as not pressed with liberty and trial court was directed to record witness statements.
Trial Court directed to record statements of Nakul Yadav and Saurabh Yadav on priority basis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 566/2022
Sonu @ Avinash Yadav S/o Sh. Kanwar Singh, Aged About 33 Years, B/c Yadav, R/o Yadvo Ka Mohalla, W.no. 7, Udairamsar, Bikaner.
(In Judicial Custody At Central Jail, Bikaner).
----Petitioner
Versus
| State, Through Pp | ----Respondent |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. J.S. Choudhary, Sr. Advocate with Mr. H.S. Shrimali |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. A.R. Choudhary, P.P. Mr. Ram Prasad Singaria, complainant |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Order
25/02/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this bail application at this stage with liberty to file fresh bail application after recording statements of Nakul Yadav as well as Saurabh Yadav.
The bail application is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty aforesaid.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, learned trial Court is directed to record the statements of abovementioned witnesses on priority basis.
(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J
34-Bharti/-
Sonu @ Avinash Yadav
The State
Devendra Kachhawaha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
