Allowed

Kanaram S/O Babulal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Mar 2022CRLMB/516/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 516/2022, this Court allowed an anticipatory bail application filed by Kanaram S/o Babulal under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with offences under Sections 379 & 188 IPC and Sections 4/21 MMRD Act.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on anticipatory bail; to furnish personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Kanaram S/O Babulal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 516/2022

¶3

Kanaram S/o Babulal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Bebolaav Ps Todaraisingh Dist. Tonk Raj.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prashant Sharma, Public Prosecutor

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA

¶9

Order

¶10

23/03/2022

¶11

This anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C in connection with FIR No.156/2021 registered at Police Station Malpura, District Tonk for the offences under Sections 379 & 188 of IPC and under Section 4/21 of MMRD Act.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle and the vehicle has already been seized. The petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Counsel further submits that interim protection from arrest has already been given to the petitioner by the coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.01.2022 and he has joined the investigation. Hence, the petitioner may kindly be released on anticipatory bail.

¶13

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-516/2022]

¶16

Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

¶17

Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioner Kanaram S/o Babulal in the aforesaid FIR by the Investigation Officer, he shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of concerned SHO/IO on the following conditions:

¶18

i) That the petitioner will make himself available for the investigation as and when required by the investigation officer.

¶19

ii) That the petitioner will not leave India without permission of the Court.

¶20

iii) That the petitioner will not temper with the evidence or threaten or pressurize the witnesses in the case.

¶21

(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J

¶22

Satyendra/46

Kanaram S/O Babulal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanaram S/O Babulal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar S/O Bhomaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohanlal S/O Shankarlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Imran @ Shanu S/O Mohammad Rafiq Kureshi Vs State of Rajasthan

Raghuveer S/O Surajmal @ Surjya Vs State of Rajasthan

Kanhaiya Singh Son of Shri Babulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sanjay S/O Kailash Vs State of Rajasthan