Allowed

Ranjeet Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC27 Jul 2022CRLMB/4681/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest under Section 374 IPC and Section 79 Juvenile Justice Act. The court directed discharge upon obtaining bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

The bail application was allowed. The petitioner was directed to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- along with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each on specific conditions.

Ranjeet Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

(1 of 2)

¶2

[CRLMB-4681/2022]

¶3

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶4

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4681/2022

¶5

Ranjeet Singh S/o Kanwraj Singh, Aged About 24 Years, B/c Rajput, R/o Sangram Singh Ki Dhani, Bhaniyana Tehsil Bhaniyana, Dist. Jaisalmer.

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

			----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. BK Mehar
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. MA Siddiqui, GA c by Mr. AR Malkani	um AAG assisted

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶11

Order

¶12

27/07/2022

¶13

This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.70/2022, Police Station Basni, District Jodhpur for the offences under Section 374 IPC & Section 79 of Juvenile Justice Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that specific allegation has been levelled by the complainant against coaccused Brijraj Singh and the petitioner was merely an employee in the hotel. Counsel submits that the petitioner has already joined the investigation, therefore no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner behind the bars for indefinite time. Thus, the petitioner may be released on anticipatory bail.

¶15

Learned AAG has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶16

Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-4681/2022]

¶19

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Ranjeet Singh S/o Kanwraj Singh in connection with FIR No.70/2022, Police Station Basni, District Jodhpur, the petitioner shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following

¶21

conditions :-

¶22

(i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶23

(ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and

¶24

(iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶25

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶26

88-MS/-

Ranjeet Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mujeeb Ahamad Vs State of Rajasthan

Sharif Khan @ Monu Vs State of Rajasthan

Dheeraj Vs State of Rajasthan

Rameshwar @ Lali @ Aditya Vs State

Rajendra Bishnoi @ Rajaram Bishnoi Vs State

Jasbeer Singh @ Momi @ Bos Vs State