Rajmal @ Raju v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail applications were dismissed as not pressed. The connected matter was listed for January 2023.
Bail applications were dismissed as not pressed. The connected matter was listed for January 2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4492/2022
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9945/2021 Chaturbhuj S/o Sh. Gokal Ji, Aged About 57 Years, Village Chargajiya, P.s. Bhinder, Dist. Udaipur (Raj.). (Presently Lodged In Sub Jail, Salumber).
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
----Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12055/2021 Nathi Bai ----Petitioner Versus State, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shambhoo Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
25/11/2022
Bail Application Nos. 4492/2022 and 9945/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press
the present bail applications.
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-4492/2022]
Accordingly, the present bail applications stand dismissed as
not pressed.
The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.
Bail Application No. 12055/2021
List this matter in the month of January, 2023.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
4-5-6-Rashi/-
Rajmal @ Raju and S/o Shri Rodilal
Ishwarlal
Chaturbhuj
Nathi Bai
State Of Rajasthan
Manoj Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court