Sunil Mehto v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal miscellaneous bail application was not pressed by counsel and was dismissed. Trial court directed to expedite trial.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed as not pressed; trial court directed to expedite trial.
What the court decided
(1 of 1)
[CRLMB-321/2022]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 321/2022
Sunil Mehto S/o Sh. Jai Kumar Mehto, Aged About 25 Years, R/o W. No. 1, Canadiya Belwara, P.s. Simri Bakhtiyarpur, Tehsil And Distt. Sahrsa (Bihar) (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Hanumangarh)
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankur Limba For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS
Order
19/07/2022
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal miscellaneous bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. can be allowed when not pressed by counsel.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sunil Mehto
- respondent
State
Coram
Rameshwar Vyas
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/321/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court