Allowed

Mohammed Shakil @ Kalu S/O Mohammed Shakoor v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 May 2022CRLMB/3188/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court of Rajasthan enlarged the petitioner on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. regarding an NDPS offence, without expressing an opinion on the merits but deeming it just and proper given the petitioner's circumstances, subject to furnishing a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was enlarged on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- payable to the State with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each.

Mohammed Shakil @ Kalu S/O Mohammed Shakoor Vs State of… — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3188/2022

¶3

Mohammed Shakil @ Kalu S/o Mohammed Shakoor, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Dharmkata Dhantatlahi Distt. Tonk (Presently Confined In Central Jail Tonk)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Ali, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Riyasat Ali, Public Prosecutor

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA

¶10

Order

¶11

05/05/2022

¶12

This bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No. 54/2022 registered at Police Station Kotwali Tonk, District Tonk for the offence under Section 8/21 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged recovered contraband is less than commercial quantity and the petitioner is behind the bars since 10.02.2022. Learned counsel further submits that the charge-sheet has been filed. As per rejection bail order, the petitioner has criminal antecedents of three cases and he is on bail in all cases. Hence, the accusedpetitioner may be released on bail.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has strongly opposed the bail application.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-3188/2022]

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

¶18

material available on record.

¶19

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case; but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Mohammed Shakil @ Kalu S/o Mohammed Shakoor shall be enlarged on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J

¶22

Ashish Kumar/18

Mohammed Shakil @ Kalu S/O Mohammed Shakoor v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Shakil @ Kalu S/O Mohammed Shakoor v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satyaprakash S/O Shri Purshottam Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamlesh S/O Prahlad Vs State of Rajasthan

Sandeep Choudhary S/O Sanwal Choudhary Vs State of Rajasthan

Chitter S/O Motilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Meena Son of Ramkhiladi Vs State of Rajasthan

Hariram @ Hariya S/O Shri Nanuram Vs State of Rajasthan