Nosad v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner, facing criminal charges, voluntarily withdrew bail application. Court granted liberty to refile after witness statements are recorded by trial court and dismissed the current application.
What did the court decide?
Liberty allowed to file afresh after recording statements of witnesses Noor Islam and Smt. Nazda Khatun; current bail application dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3093/2022
Nosad S/o Lalu, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 7, Bardah, District Arriya (Bihar) (Presently Lodged In Sub Jail, Makrana)
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
| ----Respondent | |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Vineet Jain Sr. Adv. Assisted by Mr. Ashok Kumar Panwar |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. A.R. Choudhary,PP. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
08/07/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this bail application. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file afresh after recording the statement of Noor Islam and Smt. Nazda Khatun
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nosad S/o Lalu
- respondent
State
Coram
Manoj Kumar Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/3093/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court