Allowed

Vikram Singh v. State

Rajasthan HC21 Feb 2022CRLMB/203/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a bail application for the petitioner, who was in custody since late December 2021. The court observed that a charge sheet had been filed and the trial would be time-consuming, leading to the acceptance of the bail application without deciding merits regarding the charges.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on providing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs. 25,000/- each.

Vikram Singh Vs State — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 203/2022 Vikram Singh S/o Shri Guman Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Raisar, Tehsil And Dist. Bikaner (Raj.) (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Bikaner)

¶3

----Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

State of Rajasthan through PP

¶6

----Respondent

¶7

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Kaushal Gautam
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Mukesh Trivedi,PP

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA

¶9

Order

¶10

21/02/2022

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.340/2021, Police Station Jai Narayan Vyas Colony, District Bikaner, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 458, 323, 336, 427, 147 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Heard and considered arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case; petitioner is behind the bars since 20.12.2021; charge-sheet has been filed; and trial will take time. With these submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the benefit of bail may be granted to the petitioner.

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-203/2022]

¶16

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application of the accused-petitioner and stated that seven other cases have been registered against the accused-petitioner.

¶17

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly looking to the facts that charge-sheet has been filed; accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 20.12.2021; and trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

¶18

Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Vikram Singh S/o Shri Guman Singh, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.340/2021, Police Station Jai Narayan Vyas Colony, District Bikaner, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶19

(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J

¶20

85-Rashi/-

Vikram Singh v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikram Singh v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prahalad Patidar Vs State of Rajasthan

Raju @ Rajiya @ Rajeev Vs State

Magan Vs State

Himmat Singh Vs State

Nakul Kumar Vs State

Ashok Jakhad Vs State of Rajasthan