Allowed

Chutra Ram v. State

Rajasthan HC12 Apr 2022CRLMB/1952/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur allowed a bail application filed by Chutra Ram, arrested in FIR No.111/2021 for various IPC offences. The court deemed it just and proper to grant bail without expressing an opinion on merits, directing release upon execution of a bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on execution of personal bond Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Chutra Ram Vs State — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1952/2022

¶3

Chutra Ram S/o Binza Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Haripura, Naino Ka Bass, Sarwana Police Station, Sarwana, Teh. Sanchore, Dist. Jalore. (Confined In Sub Jail, Sanchore).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

		----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Teja Ram
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, PP. Mr. Raghunath Bishnoi for complainant.

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶9

Order

¶10

12/04/2022

¶11

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.111/2021 of Police Station Sarwana, District Jalore, for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 341, 323, 354, 326, 379 & 307of IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that injured Smt. Ansi has already been examined before the trial Court as PW-1 and she declared hostile. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶13

(2 of 2)

¶14

[CRLMB-1952/2022]

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Learned counsel for the complainant concurs the fact of the compromise.

¶16

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶17

Accordingly, the second bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Chutra Ram S/o Binza Ram, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.111/2021 of Police Station Sarwana, District Jalore, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶18

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶19

31-Ishan-raksha/-

Chutra Ram v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chutra Ram v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Kumar Vs State

Aditi Sharma Vs State

Aditi Sharma Vs State

Noratnath Vs State

Suman Devi Vs State

Ashish Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan