The Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan allowed bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for five accused persons, directing their immediate release on personal bond along with two sureties.
Accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided they furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
17928/2022
Jagganath S/o Lt. Sh. Gulabnath, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Sapera Ki Dhani, Madhorajpura, Police Station Madhorajpura, District Jaipur.(At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail, Sambhar)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
Connected With
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Thrpugh P.p.
(2 of 3)
[CRLMB-17928/2022]
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Ratnawat, Adv. & Mr. Dinesh Pareek, Adv. For : Mr. Suresh Kumar, P.P. Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order
16/12/2022
These bail applications have been filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.30/2022 registered at Police Station Madhorajpura, District Jaipur (Rural) for the offence(s) under Section(s) 323, 341, 342, 365, 355, 326A, 504 & 120-B of IPC.
Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. They further submit that accused-petitioners are in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail applications.
Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case,
(3 of 3)
[CRLMB-17928/2022]
this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.
Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioners 1.Jagganath S/o Lt. Sh. Gulabnath, 2.Kamala W/o Gopal, 3.Gopal S/o Late Ramkaran, 4.Rajendra S/o Gopal & 5.Norati W/o Kalu shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DANISH USMANI /330 & 331
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners should be granted bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jagganath S/o Lt. Sh. Gulabnath
Kamala W/o Gopal
Gopal S/o Late Ramkaran
Rajendra S/o Gopal
Norati W/o Kalu
State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
