Allowed

Ramphool Meena Son of Shri Bhairuram Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Dec 2022CRLMB/17684/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for accused Ramphool Meena charged with offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 379, 325, 308, 452, and 427 IPC, directing release on bail with personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered released on bail upon furnishing Rs. 50,000 personal bond and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Ramphool Meena Son of Shri Bhairuram Meena Vs State of… — Cheque Dishonour | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17684/2022

¶3

Ramphool Meena Son Of Shri Bhairuram Meena, R/o Village Ramnagar, Police Station Andhi District Jaipur (Raj)(Presently Confined In Jaipur Jail)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kanta Prasad Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sher Singh Mahla, PP

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶9

Order

¶10

19/12/2022

¶11

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-petitioner against the impugned order dated 25.11.2022 passed by learned Court below for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 379, 325, 308, 452 & 427 IPC in FIR No. 552/2022 registered at Police Station Bassi, District Jaipur City (East).

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The accused-petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged offences and his name is not even mentioned in the FIR. He is behind the bars since 24.11.2022. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude and till then, his further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose. The co-accused persons have already been granted bail by the Hon’ble High Court. He is ready and willing to furnish bail

¶13

(2 of 2)

¶14

[CRLMB-17684/2022]

¶15

bonds for his release. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

¶18

Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶19

Therefore, the bail application is allowed. Accused-petitioner namely Ramphool Meena Son Of Shri Bhairuram Meena shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/(Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so.

¶20

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶21

SAHIL SONI /282

Ramphool Meena Son of Shri Bhairuram Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramphool Meena Son of Shri Bhairuram Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murari @ Murro S/O Shri Sovaran Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Banti S/O Ramgopal Vs State of Rajasthan

Bharat Kumar Soni Son of Late Shri Bhagwan Soni Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikas S/O Kailashchand Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Rampal S/O Seduram Vs State of Rajasthan

Sanjay @ Sitaram Son of Shri Vijay Vs State of Rajasthan