Dismissed

Subhash Son of Shri Maharaj Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Dec 2022CRLMB/17177/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The bench dismissed a joint bail application filed by five accused persons in a public nuisance and riot case under Sections 147, 148 IPC. The court observed that the accused names were not listed in the chargesheet but noted the anticipatory bail prayed was granted in 2016 without prior bail infringement. The court clarified the conditions for their continued release under the granted anticipator

What the court decided

AI extract

Subhash Son of Shri Maharaj Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17177/2022

¶3

Subhash Son Of Shri Maharaj Singh, R/o Village Didhi, Police Station Rajakheda, District Dholpur (Raj.) ( At Present Petitioner Confined In Distt. Jail Dhopur)

¶4

Sher Singh S/o Ramcharan, R/o Village Jarga, Police Station Rajakheda, District Dholpur (Raj.) ( At Present Petitioner Confined In Distt. Jail Dhopur)

¶5

Bijendra Singh S/o Jagdish Prasad, R/o Village Ward No. 35 Kasba Rajakheda, Police Station Rajakheda, District Dholpur (Raj.) ( At Present Petitioner Confined In Distt. Jail Dhopur)

¶6

Vinod S/o Bahadur Singh, R/o Village Ward No. 24 Kaswa Rajakheda, Police Station Rajakheda, District Dholpur (Raj.) ( At Present Petitioner Confined In Distt. Jail Dhopur)

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Upadhyay For Respondent(s) : Mr. Atul Sharma, PP

¶12

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶13

Order

¶14

12/12/2022

¶15

izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g izkFkZuk i= i z Lrqr dj izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZ gSA

¶16

cgl lquh xbZA ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks ekeys esa feF;k :i ls lafyIr fd;k x;k gS] bl ekeys esa djhc 200&250 yksxksa }kjk iqfyl ij iFkjko fd, tkus dk vkjksi gS] fdUrq izkFkhZx.k dk uke izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa ugha gS rFkk u gh vkgr

¶17

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-17177/2022]

¶18

iqfyldehZ ds izk.k?kkrd pksV vkuk ik;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd ftu vfHk;qDrx.k dk uke izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vafdr gS] mudh fu;fer tekur dk izkFkZuk i= fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk Lohdkj fd;k tk pqdk gSA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd izdj.k o"kZ 2016 esa ntZ djk;k x;k Fkk] ekeys dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gS] izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k djhc Ms< ekg ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] muds fo:) iwoZ esa dksbZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ ugha gSA vr% tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA

¶19

;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;k ,oa dFku fd;k fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ij /kkjk 147] 148] 149] 283] 332] 353] 307] 336] 427] 436 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk o 3 ihMhihih ,DV dk vk{ksi yxk;k x;k gS rFkk muds }kjk iqfyldfeZ;ksa ij iFkjko fd;k x;k] ftlesa iqfyldehZ ds pksVsa dkfjr gqbZ gSA vr% vfHk;qDrx.k dk tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k tk;sA

¶20

lquk x;k ,oa ,oa leLr rdksZa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr] vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) iwoZ vkijkf/kd fjdkMZ ugha gksus] izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa ftu vfHk;qDrx.k dk uke vafdr gS] dh tekur dk izkFkZuk i= fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk Lohdkj fd, tkus rFkk vkgr iqfyldehZ ds 'kjhj ij izk.k?kkrd pksV ugha ik;s tkus ds dze esa izLrqar rdksZ rFkk vfHk;qDrx.k dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶21

ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izR;sd izkFkhZ iqfyl Fkkuk& jktk[ksMk] /kkSyiqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 23@2016 ds ekeys esa ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mUgsa cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr;kWa izLrqr djs rFkk mudh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mUgsa bl ekeys esa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶22

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶23

JITENDRA SINGH PANWAR /235

Subhash Son of Shri Maharaj Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Subhash Son of Shri Maharaj Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajuram Sinwar S/O Laluram Vs Imrati Devi W/O Rajuram

Pooja Vadwa D/O Late Sh. Chandrabhan Vadwa Vs State of Rajasthan

Heena Bano W/O Arif Khan D/O Phool Mohammad Pathan Vs Arif Khan S/O Habib Khan Pathan

Kailash Kumar Dhaka S/O Sanwarmal Dhaka Vs State of Rajasthan

Deshraj Singh S/O Shri Bhagwan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Billu S/O Gopal Vs State of Rajasthan