Allowed

Rajkumar @ Champi S/O Govind Prasad Mahajan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Nov 2022CRLMB/16438/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application was filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. regarding an offence of theft triable by Magistrate. The High Court deemed it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail despite opposition by the Public Prosecutor.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner be enlarged on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Rajkumar @ Champi S/O Govind Prasad Mahajan Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16438/2022

¶3

Rajkumar @ Champi S/o Govind Prasad Mahajan, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Keshar Colony, At Present R/o Agrasain Vihar Police Station Nai Mandi, Hindaun City, District Karauli (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail Hindaun City, Karauli)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Mehla, PP

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶9

Order

¶10

09/11/2022

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.522/2022, Police Station Nai Mandi Hindaun, District Karauli (Raj.) for the offence under Section 379 IPC.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the offence alleged to have been committed by the petitioner is triable by Magistrate. The petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time for disposal. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the petitioner.

¶13

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶14

I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-16438/2022]

¶16

Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

¶17

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Rajkumar @ Champi S/o Govind Prasad Mahajan shall be enlarged on bail in FIR 522/2022, Police Station Nai Mandi Hindaun, District Karauli (Raj.) provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called

¶18

upon to do so.

¶19

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶20

ANAND TANWAR /143

Rajkumar @ Champi S/O Govind Prasad Mahajan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajkumar @ Champi S/O Govind Prasad Mahajan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganesh Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Shweta Senwai Vs State

Suyog Sanjay Senwai Vs State

Lalita Prasad Son of Late Shri Devi Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Santosh Kumar S/O Chhitar Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Nachiket Kalal S/O Jagdish Pareta Vs State of Rajasthan