Santosh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Single bench anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. allowed for bonafide purchasers apprehending arrest in cheating and forgery case. Conditions imposed regarding interrogation and movement restrictions.
What did the court decide?
Bail application allowed; petitioners to be released on bail upon furnishing personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
- S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1467/2022
- Smt. Santosh W/o Prakashkumar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Sugaliya, Teh. Marwar Junction, Dist. Pali (Raj.)
- Prakash Kumar S/o Sh. Banshilal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Sugaliya, Teh. Marwar Junction, Dist. Pali (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
State, Through Pp
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. JVS Deora |
----Respondent |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, |
PP. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. Santosh W/o Prakashkumar
- petitioner
Prakash Kumar S/o Sh. Banshilal
- respondent
State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/1467/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court