The Rajasthan High Court rejected the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner was allowed to surrender before the trial court with an assurance of non-arrest until his bail application is decided.
Petitioner permitted to surrender before trial court on or before 31.10.2022; no arrest expected until bail application is decided by trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1445/2022
Manoj Kumar Sah S/o Shri Sukhi Lal Sah, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Laxmipur Patari, Ward No. 5, District Sirha (Nepal) At Present Barmer (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Surya Prakash Sharma : Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, Public Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
19/10/2022
Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, hence this bail application is rejected.
However, the petitioner is permitted to surrender before the concerned trial court on or before 31.10.2022 and file an application for bail and it is expected from the concerned trial court that the bail application will be decided on the same day.
Till 31.10.2022, the petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with FIR No. 409/2021, PS Kotwali, District Barmer for offence under Sections 341, 354A(2) of IPC, Section 3(1)B(i) and 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
161-Mak/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner.
Manoj Kumar Sah
State of Rajasthan
Manoj Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
