Allowed

Mahendra v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Nov 2022CRLMB/14436/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was allowed. The petitioner, arrested for offences under IPC Sections 341, 354, 354-D, 376(2)(N), was granted bail on account of a compromise. The court ordered him to furnish a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail in FIR 329/2022 upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Mahendra Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14436/2022

¶3

Mahendra S/o Shri Ram Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Gordhanpura Tehsil Bijoliya Dist. Bhilwara (Presently Lodged In Dist. Jail Bhilwara)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

		----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr.Ramesh Chandra Purohit, Adv.
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr.Mahipal Bishnoi, PP Mr.Bhagat Dadhich, Adv. (for complainant)

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶9

Order

¶10

14/11/2022

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.329/2022, Police Station Bijolia, Distt. Bhilwara for the offence under Sections 341, 354, 354-D, 376(2)(N) of IPC.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a compromise has been arrived at in between the parties. The petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶13

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶14

Learned counsel for the complainant has concurred the fact

of compromise.

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-14436/2022]

I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Mahendra S/o Shri Ram Singh shall be enlarged on bail in FIR No.329/2022, Police Station Bijolia, Distt. Bhilwara provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶21

249-NK/-

Mahendra v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahendra v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Majeed S/O Kherati Vs State of Rajasthan

Ajruddin S/O Gheesa Khan, Vs State of Rajasthan

Abdul Manan @ Manu Vs State of Rajasthan

Karulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Pooja @ Palak Vs State of Rajasthan

Dinesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan