This High Court order granted bail to Devilal, accused in theft and cheating offences, dismissing the Public Prosecutor's opposition and directing him to furnish a personal bond.
Accused petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.6- Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application NO. 1076212022
Devilal S/o Shankar, R/o Jhadoda, P.s .chauth Ka Barwara, DistSawai Madhopur (Raj.) (M Present Confined In District Jail Dausa).
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ".
. , . I 4-
.4 ;; :a 7 .A
;.-,-, [fqv 8 ' ----Respondent
' &' ti*-.
, " ,.I-.
For Petitioner@) : Mr. Umesh Dixit !,7 q4.+. B 2 .$, <X
; F /.
For ~espo'ndent(s) : Mr. Babulal Nasuna, PP
" '9
'6 ,A
;, -, .
HON'BLE MR. 3USTIC.E FARJAND ALI
18/07/2022
.. .. , .v, r:, . .( .. ;. ,,' . , t :>., . .,: . ;P'--'~~ ~,c.h>.: . . Order . . . ... .: L~,... ., .,.; .-.i.'.x$ . 1 . . . . , . ..- , )'. , . , . ,. . . . . . .- , < . :,:-;;'. -. ; ... . ' ,. .., 'i,'. <;:..<. . **.i:..:,L** '-i-';;:', . ,;.' : , **c** {7L,;&i:;i!.:+J- **;** > :;,<.;,, * .Ls,.3 ; :* . *.,~~2;pq~<' LF; t ,,... '$
1. The instant bail application has.,be&sjfiled .' . , under Section 439 .; , ',: :$! **,<A** **_,.J_** ., Cr.P.C. on behalf of **accused-petitio~erevilal** S/o Shankar against 1- f? i. b' the order impugned passed by cbnce~ed Court below for the r. ., 8 -.-, c. t... - of IPC in FIR No. offence(s) under Sections 454, 457"&.'.'380 . . I,. ,, - ,* ;, . * . , ,- -.* ..:I'* >: District Dausa. 411/2000 registered at Police .. tation-'~also I ..: f I~: -... -..-" . ,;$,:y - _( , ,'- . .: --,- 5 r ..Yd 2 rfltp * * 2. Learned counsel for thk adCused-petitioner a submits that a , .,.,. :",false case has been foisted against st$leetoner. He is behind the bars since long time.Nouseful purpose would be servedby keeping him behind the bars till disposal of the case.
learnedPublic Prosecutor opposed the bail Per contra, application.
Heard learned counsel for both the parties. Perused the entire material made available on record. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and looking to
[CRLMB-10762/2022]
. (2 of 2)
the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this court deems it just and Proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 CrmPmCm is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in
the sum of Rs.50,000/with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance ). "- before the court ~oncerned 'on alib.;th&aates -.> -..B of hearing as and <. '. ' ' 2 f_ '4% ; -.\ when called upon to do so. us. **&f_ p'.** ." . ,. - ,. - - f, .;.,;<. t7 . (FA WAN L:+, B ALI), J .?'
p'. ." . ,. - ,. - - .;.,;<. t7 . h.
Rajat Kumar/lGO
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused petitioner Devilal S/o Shankar is entitled to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. despite being confined in jail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Devilal S/o Shankar
State Of Rajasthan
Justice Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
