Allowed

Mukesh S/O Kajod Mal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC22 Mar 2022CRLMB/1029/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court enlarged the petitioner on anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a case involving offences under IPC Sections 188, 379, 353 and MMDR Act Section 4/21, subject to specific bonds and conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner subject to a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, along with conditions to appear for investigation, not leave India, and not

Mukesh S/O Kajod Mal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Anticipatory Bail Application No.

¶3

1029/2022

¶4

Mukesh S/o Kajod Mal Meena, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Chanda Ki Dhani Seedra Tehsil Niwai Distt. Tonk Raj.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prashant Sharma, Public Prosecutor

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA

¶10

Order

¶11

22/03/2022

¶12

This anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C in connection with FIR No.94/2021 registered at Police Station Niwai Sadar, District Tonk for the offences under Sections 188, 379 & 353 of IPC and under Section 4/21 of MMDR Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present case, no injury has been attributed to any person and nothing is to be recovered from the petitioner. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Hence, the petitioner may kindly be released on anticipatory bail.

¶14

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-1029/2022]

¶16

Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

¶17

Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioner Mukesh S/o Kajod Mal Meena in the aforesaid FIR by the Investigation Officer, he shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of concerned SHO/IO on the following conditions:

¶18

i) That the petitioner will make himself available for the investigation as and when required by the investigation officer.

¶19

ii) That the petitioner will not leave India without permission of the Court.

¶20

iii) That the petitioner will not temper with the evidence or threaten or pressurize the witnesses in the case.

¶21

(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J

¶22

Satyendra/59

Mukesh S/O Kajod Mal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh S/O Kajod Mal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Kumar S/O Sri Ramesh Vs State of Rajasthan

Hanif S/O Lukman Vs State of Rajasthan

Deepak S/O Lakhan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunil Kumar S/O Bhomaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohanlal S/O Shankarlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Imran @ Shanu S/O Mohammad Rafiq Kureshi Vs State of Rajasthan