The Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur considered a bail application pending against a petitioner. The court noted the petitioner had filed appeals and was pursuing them, and concluded he was entitled to temporary bail to pursue these pending proceedings.
Petitioner granted temporary bail to pursue pending appeals.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10057/2022
Guddu Banjara @ Gudiya @ Gudya @ Bheemsingh S/o Shri Bhoma Banjara, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Ratanpuriya Post Baval PS Javad Dist. Neemach M.P. (At Present Lodged In Dist. Jail Pali)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Niwas Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Muktyar Khan PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS
Order
23/08/2022
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls tekur dk ;g vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk lnj ikyh] ftyk ikyh esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 219@2019] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@15] 29 ,uMhih,l vf/kfu;e ds ekeys esa izLrqr gqvk gSA
geus cgl tekur vkosnu lquh rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ jgk fd izLrqr izdj.k esa MksMkiksLr dh cjkenxh lgvfHk;qDr mRreflag ls gksuk crk;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls dksbZ cjkenxh ugha gq;h gSA eqrkfcd vfHk;kstd dsl izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk iksMkiksLr Hkjok;k x;k FkkA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh mRreflag ls nwjHkk’k ij ckrphr ckcr dksbZ lk{; ugha gSA lgvfHk;qDr vfuy o jes”k nsoklh dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur vkosnu la[;k Øe”k% 2799@2022 o 3601@2022 bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk fnukad Øe”k% 08-03-2022 o 27-04-2022 dks Lohdkj fd;s tk pqds gSaA
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-10057/2022]
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ekeyk muls fHkUu ugha gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnukad 0207-2022 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk dFku gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) tks vU; rhu izdj.k ,uMhih,l vf/kfu;e ds rgr ntZ gksuk crk;k x;k gS muesa og nks’keqDr gks pqdk gSA vuqla/kku iw.kZ gksdj vkjksi i= is”k fd;k tk pqdk gSA vUoh{kk esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk gSA mDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa tekur dh izkFkZuk dhA
blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;kA
tekur vkosnu ij fopkj fd;kA ;ksX; vf/koDrkx.k }kjk cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk tqeZ dh izdfr o ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa fo”ks’kr;k i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; dh izdfr ,oa lgvfHk;qDrx.k vfuy o jes”k nsoklh dh tekur gks tkus ds rF; dks n`f’Vxr j[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkuk mfpr gksxkA
vkns”k gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr xqMMw catkjk mQZ xqfM;k mQZ xqM;k mQZ Hkheflag iq= Hkksek catkjk iqfyl Fkkuk lnj ikyh] ftyk ikyh esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 219@2019] ds ekeys esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa viuh fu;fer mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur izLrqr dj rLnhd djk ns rks mls bl izdj.k esa tekur ij rqjar fjgk dj fn;k tkosA
(RAMESHWAR VYAS),J
36-Lohra/-
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner qualifies for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC considering he has already filed and is pursuing appeals where the court allowed his request to be taken cognizance of pet
Whether the lack of investigation/discharge by the prosecution affects the grant of bail in a pending criminal trial.
Whether the petitioner's pending appeals under Sections 735 and 739 BNSS justify granting temporary bail.
Guddu Banjara @ Gudiya @ Gudya @ Bheemsingh
State Of Rajasthan
Rameshwar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
