Single-judge order admitting leave to appeal in a criminal matter. The court held there were valid grounds to allow the appellant to file an appeal against the impugned judgment. A bailable warrant was issued against the respondent.
Leave to appeal allowed; memo treated as appeal and registered; bailable warrant of Rs. 25,000/- issued against respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 75/2020
Gyanchand Loonker S/o Shri Achal Chand Ji Loonker, Aged About 46 Years, By Caste Oswal, Resident Of 36, Jhuro Ka Bas, Pali.
----Appellant
Versus
Mohammad Umar S/o Karimji, B/c Chipa Musalman, R/o 72, Chipon Ki Dhal, Pali.
----Respondent
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. Sheetal Kumbhat |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Ms. Madhu Arora for Mr. Sanjeet |
| Purohit |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
21/11/2022
This Court is of the opinion that there are valid and substantial grounds for grant of leave to the appellant for filing the appeal against the impugned judgment.
Accordingly, the application for grant of leave to appeal is allowed. The memo of leave to appeal be treated as an appeal and it be registered as such.
Admit.
Let bailable warrant of Rs.25,000/- be issued against the respondent.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
97-Sudheer/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether valid grounds exist to grant leave to appeal against the impugned judgment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gyanchand Loonker
Mohammad Umar
DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
