The single judge of the Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, granted leave to the appellant to file a second appeal against the impugned judgment, admitting the appeal and issuing a bailable warrant against the respondent.
Leave to appeal allowed; memo treated as appeal and registered; admit; bailable warrant of Rs. 25,000 issued against respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 44/2022
Haajraram S/o Shri Jeevnaram, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Bhu Tehsil And District Jaisalmer (Rajasthan)
----Appellant
Versus
Madan Singh S/o Shri Arjun Singh, R/o Village Badoda, Tehsil And District Jaisalmer.
----Respondent
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. Narayan Yadav. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Rakesh Sharma. |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
02/08/2022
Heard.
This Court is of the opinion that there are valid and substantial grounds for grant of leave to the appellant for filing the appeal against the impugned judgment.
Accordingly, the application for grant of leave to appeal is allowed. The memo of leave to appeal be treated as an appeal and it be registered as such.
Admit.
Let bailable warrant of Rs.25,000/- be issued against the respondent.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
161-/Jitender//-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant leave to the appellant to file a second appeal against the impugned judgment.
Haajraram S/o Shri Jeevnaram
Madan Singh S/o Shri Arjun Singh
Dr. Justice Pushendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
