The High Court of Rajasthan, Jodhpur allowed the application for leave to appeal against an impugned judgment in a Special Bail Case. The bench granted leave, treating the memo as an appeal and issuing notice to the respondent.
Leave to appeal allowed; memo treated as appeal; notice issued to respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 205/2021
Himmat Singh Chundawat
----Appellant
Versus
Madan Singh Rathore
----Respondent
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. Achala |
Ram,On VC |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
20/01/2022
Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the judgment impugned.
This Court is of the opinion that there are valid and substantial ground for grant of leave to appeal for filing the appeal against the impugned judgment.
Accordingly, the application for grant of leave to appeal is allowed. The memo of leave to appeal be treated as an appeal and it be registered as such.
Record has already been received.
Admit. Issue notice to sole respondent returnable within four weeks.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
52-nidhi/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there are valid grounds to grant leave to appeal against the impugned judgment in Special Bail Case.
Himmat Singh Chundawat
Madan Singh Rathore
MADAN GOPAL Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
