Bench dismissed a bail cancellation petition. The court found the impugned order to contain sufficient justification based on prima facie case and pendency of civil suits regarding land dispute, thus refusing interference.
Bail cancellation application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 41/2022
Akash Rajoriya S/o Shri Omprakash Rajoriya, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 267 Scheme No. 1 Arya Nagar Alwar Ps Kotwali Alwar Distt. Alwar Raj.
----Complainant/Applicant
Versus
----Respondents
For Applicant(s) : Mr. S.S. Sunda For State : Mr. Sher Singh Mehla, PP For Respondent No. : Mr. Manish Gupta with 2 Ms. Shweta Soni
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order
25/08/2022
“8- mHk; i{k ds rdksZa ij xkSj fd;k rFkk dsl Mk;jh dk lko/kkuh ls voyksdu fd;kA loZizFke ifjoknh vkdk’k jktksfj;k us izFke lwpuk fjiskVZ fnukafdr 16-08-2021 esa dk’rdkj dh Hkwfe ds [kljk uacjku dk dksbZ gokyk ugha fn;k gSA dsl Mk;jh ,oa rF;kRed fjiksVZ ds voyksdu ls tkfgj gksrk gS fd eqLrxhl vkSj izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh dCts dk’r dh Hkwfe ikl&ikl fLFkr gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr foØe flag ds vkosnu ij fooknxzLr Hkwfe dk lhek Kku djk;k tkuk Fkk] ijarq ftl Hkwfe dk lhek Kku fnukad 11-082021 dks djk;k tkuk Fkk vkSj ftu [kljk uacjku dh iSekbZ’k dh tkuh Fkh os [kljk uacj iM+kSlh [kkrsnkj vFkkZr eqLrxhl i{k dh [kkrsnkjh dh ckm.Mªh dh pkjnhokjh ds vanj ik;s x;s rFkk xkMZ }kjk esuxsV can djus ls lhek Kku ugha gks ldkA blds i’pkr fnukad 16-08-2021 dks iqu% lhek Kku iz’kklfud vf/kdkfj;ksa dh mifLFkfr esa gqvkA rF;kRed fjiksVZ ls ;g Hkh tkfgj gqvk gS fd mlls iwoZ gh
(2 of 3)
[CRLBC-41/2022]
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk gLrxr izdj.k dh ?kVuk dkfjr dh FkhA dsl Mk;jh ds voyksdu ls ;g Hkh Li"V gksrk gS fd i{kdkjku ds e/; fofHkUu jktLo ekeys yafcr gSA Lo;a eqLrxhl dh Hkwfe ds vanj dqN gn rd vU; i{k dh Hkwfe dh iSekbZ’k ik;k tkuk Hkh tkfgj gqvk gSA iqfyl@U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa i{kdkj jgrs gSa rks i{kdjku ds e/; jktLo ekeys ;k vU; fookn mRiUu gksus dh laHkkouk jgrh gSA rF;kRed fjiksVZ ls ;g Hkh tkfgj gqvk gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ij Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dh /kkjk 323] 506 dk vijk/k xfBr ugha gksuk ik;k x;k gSA tgka rd iRFkj dks mBkdj ys tkus dk iz’u gS rks rF;kRed fjiksVZ ls tkfgj gqvk gS fd fnukad 18-08-2021 dks bl laca/k esa iqfyl }kjk /kkjk 151 tk-QkS- dh dk;Zokgh dh x;h Fkh vkSj VªsDVj dks ,e-oh-,DV esa tIr dj fy;k x;k Fkk ftlls tkfgj gksrk gS fd ;Fkksfpr dk;Zokgh oDr ?kVuk dh tk pqdh FkhA vc bl LVst ij fdlh rjg dh dksbZ cjkenxh djuk tkfgj ugha gqvk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa dksfoM 19 @vksehØkse egkekjh dh fo"ke ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, rFkk bl izØe ij izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, fcuk ,oa izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa vkSj ifjfLFkfr;ksa e|sutj j[krs gq,] izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dk vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 438 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk Lohdkj fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA”
(3 of 3)
[CRLBC-41/2022]
dismissed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
JKP/10
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the trial court's bail order despite the complainant's contentions.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Akash Rajoriya
State Of Rajasthan
Vikram Singh
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
