Mamala and Ors. v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court disposed of criminal appeal. Conviction of appellant Mangtu under Sections 324/307 IPC was maintained but sentence reduced to time already undergone. Appeal regarding deceased appellants abated.
What did the court decide?
Conviction of appellant Mangtu maintained; sentence reduced to period already undergone. Personal bond of Rs.25,000 and surety directed for interim bail.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 477/1986
- Mamala S/o Kishana (Died)
- Mawasi S/o Mamala (Died)
- Charani S/o Mangu (Died)
- Mangtu S/o Mamala
all the residents of Village Khareta, at present confined in District Jail at Alwar
----Appellant Versus
State of Rajasthan
----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. P. C. Jain, Adv. Mr. Zeeshan Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nainaram Saran, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the sentence against appellant Mangtu should be reduced鉴于 he has undergone trial trauma for decades
Whether the appeal against conviction and sentence should be disposed of given the death of three appellants
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mamala S/o Kishana (Died)
- appellant
Mawasi S/o Mamala (Died)
- appellant
Charani S/o Mangu (Died)
- appellant
Mangtu S/o Mamala
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/477/1986
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court