Dismissed
Vikram v. State
Rajasthan HCCRLA/298/2000
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The appeal was dismissed as abated because the sole appellant had expired on 05.09.2006, based on the report received on 11.07.2022. No substantive legal proposition was laid down.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
(1 of 1)
¶2
[CRLA-298/2000]
¶3
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
¶4
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 298/2000
¶5
Vikram
¶6
----Appellant
¶7
Versus
¶8
State
¶9
----Respondent
¶10
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Chaitanya Gahlot. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA.
¶11
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
¶12
Order
¶13
11/07/2022
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Vikram
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/298/2000
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court