Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Vs M/S Miraj Developers Pvt. Ltd.

The appeal preferred by the appellant department was dismissed for want of prosecution on account of non-compliance of the per-emptory order. Now, this restoration application has been moved which is delayed by 276 days. Notice of the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been served on the respondent. No one has put in appearance on its behalf.

¶13

We find the reasons mentioned in the application for condonation of delay to be germane and hence, the same is accepted. The delay occasioned in filing the restoration application is condoned.

¶14

Heard on the restoration application.

¶15

Considering the overall facts and circumstances as prevailing on the record, the prayer for restoration of the appeal is accepted. The restoration application is thus allowed. The Income Tax Appeal

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRES-47/2020]

¶18

No.1/2018 is restored to its original number and shall be listed for

¶19

admission after one week.

¶20

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J

¶21

(SANDEEP MEHTA),J

¶22

27-Tikam/-

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central v. M/S Miraj Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central v. M/S Miraj Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harsilal Vs State

Babu Lal Siyag Vs State of Rajasthan

Narayan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Shanti Devi Vs State of Rajasthan

Lrs of Kanhiya Lal and Ors. Vs B.O.R.,Raj.Ajmer and Ors.

Rakesh Gaur Vs the State of Rajasthan