The High Court dismissed a civil revision petition challenging the lower court's dismissal of an application to set aside a plaint for insufficient court fee. The Court found no illegality in the valuation as per the pleaded sale consideration.
Revision petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 68/2021
Smt. Kamla Devi D/o Shri Rudaram W/o Shri Ramlal Chauhan, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Gram Radawas, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner-defendant
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pooran Chand Verma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
17/11/2022
(2 of 2)
[CR-68/2021]
raised an objection that the valuation of suit property is much higher than indicated in the sale deed and therefore, the plaintiff has not valued the suit property and has paid the insufficient Court fee.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
NITIN /26
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the lower court committed jurisdictional error by dismissing the plaintiff's objection regarding insufficient court fee paid on the suit property valued at Rs. 8 lac.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Kamla Devi
State Of Rajasthan
Smt. Santara Devi
Sub Registrar
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
