The High Court dismissed a civil revision petition challenging the rejection of an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC after the parties informed the court that they had amicably settled their dispute, rendering the revision infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 37/2020
Rakshpal Singh S/o Shri Berisal Singh Charan, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Dulchas Via Bissau, Tehsil Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
All R/o Village Dulchas Tehsil Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan)
……...Plaintiff-Respondents
(2 of 3)
[CR-37/2020]
----Respondents-Proforma
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ginni Jain for Mr. R.D.S. Naruka For Respondent(s) : mr. Shilesh Sharma, AGC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
07/07/2022
This revision petition has been filed by the petitionerdefendant against rejection of his application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.
(3 of 3)
[CR-37/2020]
It has been contended that both parties have amicably settled their dispute out of court, hence the revision petition has become infructuous.
In view of above, the revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
TN/104
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition had become infructuous due to an out-of-court settlement between the parties?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rakshpal Singh
Kalyan Singh
Sultan Singh
Smt. Indu Kanwar
Kishandan
The State Of Rajasthan
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
